Посмотреть все темы с участием Reuben
For the love of live
One of my friends doesn't like live music. He says that the acoustics of concert venues & the screaming of the crowd ruins the music. To be honest I think he's right. But I don't go to big concerts to enjoy the music so much as to celebrate it.
It's a similar thing with juggling, people's bobbing heads obscure your view & you're stuck with all the mistakes that can't be edited out. But even with the increasing onset of PSF seeing a live performance still has that something extra. I often get excited about seeing a performer who I have already been amazed by online & I look forward to the chance to applaud them in person.
This post will be a self indulgent list of a few of my favourite live performances which have knocked spots off of sitting in front of my pooter.
Warning, instances of ridiculous flowery language will follow
Best ball juggling act
Ben Jennings on the renegade stage at the BJC in Nottingham 1997 (the one with Jay Gilligan running five clubs in the background).
This was my first juggling festival. I had been juggling for two & a half years & had already fallen in love with technical three ball juggling by this point. I was also mistakenly thinking I was pretty good, in that I could do hundreds of different tricks. I could even do a lot of the stuff that Ben was performing, but everything he did was better than the way I did it. Prior to this act I treated my progression in juggling almost like a checklist in that I 'collected' tricks. This act showed me that juggling could be beautiful as opposed to being a neat party trick.
Best club juggling act
Luke Wilson at Crawley Circus Festival 2006.
I think it would be a struggle to find someone who hasn't seen Luke's solo club routine. This was the fourth time I had seen it & I didn't spot any noticeable changes since my first time. This is one of those acts that doesn't change much because it can't get any better. The skill level is very high but what sets this act apart from everything else for me is the exceptionally high standard of presentation. The act is just so incredibly polished.
But what made this performance more special than the others? I'd recently come back from the EJC in Ireland where we saw Luke perform a different show which contained a lot of very geeky & experimental stuff. I had been raving about Luke to my girlfriend at the time, & while she 'got' his show & understood that it was difficult & very clever, I think she was underwhelmed & certainly didn't see why I was such a fan.
Crawley is also a very special festival for TWJC. I spend a lot of time badgering our members into attending, & of course one of my main points is that it is always a great show. During the months leading up to the festival I was zealously telling our newbies how fantastic it was going to be. That year a lot of our away team had either never been or only been to one or two festivals before.
It was a great show & Luke's finale was awesome. After the show our newbies were as wide eyed & excited as I first was. To be able to share that with my friends was very special.
Best diabolo act
William Wei-Lang Ling at the BJC in Nottingham 2007.
Of all the things I am jaded about diabolo has been the worst hit. For years the diabolo scene has been over saturated with high level diaboloists that all have a similar style. William blew everyone away by going nuclear on stage. The release of energy was astounding.
Some standing ovations are like, "hmm, other people are standing... yeah I'm going to stand too" but this one everyone jumped to their feet en masse.
(prior to this my favourite diabolo act was Barnesy's popcorn routine performed on the Renegade stage at BJC2K!)
Best aerial act
I write as one of the survivors who witnessed Alban Elved. I have sat through many dull generic aerial acts in my time. It was many years before I saw a decent aerial act aside from the flying trapeze outside of a traditional circus.
I suspect I won't be the only one who loved Ockham's Razor when they performed at Crawley in 2007. They used an original apparatus set up & presented a wonderful piece of theatre which was at different times funny & beautiful. I was mesmerised throughout.
I later caught one of their shows in Brighton, it was another great example of their style. When they took their bows I remember feeling disappointed that it was only 20 minutes long, only to work out later that we had been in there for over an hour.
Honourable mentions
Catching Kris Kremo at the EJC in 2006 was fantastic. I'd seen many clips online of Kris' performances but this was my first chance to catch a complete routine. His performance in between tricks was just as good as his juggling. I can't think of a single modern performer who matches his presence, class, dignity or charisma on stage. Again this is another act that has stayed roughly the same for years because any change would be for the worse.
Pink in concert at Brighton 2002 almost got the top slot for best aerial act. Yes, the popstar. She did a really good silks routine but on a cargo net which matched many a routine I've seen in a traditional circus & in public shows. Except she did it while belting out one of her songs at the same time without dropping a note or sounding out of breath. I was not expecting that at all.
From 1999 to 2003 Tunbridge Wells held a winter street festival which brought a huge range of street acts to the town. It was supposed to be a way of enticing shoppers into the town centre between Christmas & new year, but for anti-consumerists like me it was just an awesome free festival that would see me in town early & running up & down the precinct to catch each act. 2003 was a particularly wet year, & some acts had an audience of one. At the end of one of the days the last act was Martinez & Fabrega's Incredible Bull Circus. Unfortunately for them the heavens really opened, they shouted themselves hoarse just to be heard over the sound of the rain drops. The act itself was a collection of daft stunts with various toys, fireworks & such, but because of the rain nothing worked. In the end the act pretty much boiled down to the two performers explaining what should have happened, & it was hilarious. Despite the conditions they managed to hold an audience of over a dozen people with nothing but their showmanship.
So there we go. What have you got out of a live show that you couldn't have got from vimeotube.tv?
Re: For the love of live
Other than performances which just aren't available on the web (often because the performer doesn't want them to be) the reason live shows turn out to be more enjoyable strikes me as being the same for comedy and performance art: things going wrong or not according to plan. Two particular examples spring to mind:
In the 2008 Byjoty,a guy called Luke did an act which required a table (a small square board, in this case) entirely propped up by clubs. This was set up before the performance by the stage hand, Tom Derrick, but he couldn't quite get it to stand up, so in the end Tom had to crouch down and hold it up himself. Luke didn't realize this during his act at first and there was a pretty hilarious contrast between Luke's routine and Tom trying to look inconspicuous at the back of the stage. You can see what is possibly the moment of realization at about 20 seconds into this: http://juggling.tv/3187
Another great moment was at Crawley 2008, when a double act (Victor and Guillermo) had a gangster themed passing routine. There were some serious failures with the sound tracks going on at the right time, but Guillermo managed to keep in character and started (jokingly) threatening the sound technician in the style of a gangster. Although the whole act was great, this really made it.
I think it's fair to say that everything seems more impressive live though, just because you feel part of what's happening. One of the best and funniest shows I remember going to was by Paul Daniels, a magician, who did an hour long set. By the end I had a headache from laughing. While there is some material of him on line, I doubt I'd find any of it as funny as I did that show.
Thanks,
Reuben
After trying some squeeze catch patterns (where more than one ball is caught by the same hand at the same time), I started wondering if it were possible to do a three ball pattern made up of only multiplexes and squeezes. Every duplex would involve one ball being effectively a pass (which raises severe technical problems) and the other going into the air. The passed ball would be one half of a squeeze catch, then this would repeat on the other side. I managed to run a few rounds, but was curious about what the siteswap, as I'm not very good at multiplex/synch notation. Here's a video: https://youtu.be/8nWl93i5O9Y (it's right at the beginning)
I'm thinking it's [21]. Any other theories?
p.s. the second pattern in the video is similarly weird, but with 4 balls. The same question applies.
Thanks :)
Reuben
I guess ([42x],0)* is probably the same as [21], but the pattern isn't synchronous, and [42x]* would be 6 balls how I'd parse it. Also I think that the 2x only works if it's explicitly (,) synchronized.
As for the slomo button, I agree, I had to turn on youtube's html5 trial to check because that has a speed setting. Given that JTV works for me considerably better in html5, it would be nice for JTV's html5 player to have a slomo button.
Stuff I learnt today.
& as a final thought: JEEEEENNNNNSSSSSOOOOOOONNNNNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!
That is all.
That's a good point, it is exactly like the Georgian Shuffle except without the single throw tagged on the end.
1: There's a whole genre of interesting patterns involving a multiplex from one hand while the other drops a ball from above. One nice variation to the pattern you described is where you catch the dropped ball (having thrown the stacked multiplex) and before catching the lower stacked one throw it (the dropped one) up again to the top hand (which should already have caught the top stacked ball), so that you end with two in the top hand. To get back to where you started, you can do the same in reverse, with a squeeze instead of a multiplex.
4: Strange, isn't it. Any theories as to why?
Reuben :)
1: Ooh, that's nice (took me a little while to stamp out the instinct to claw the single ball after it is thrown back up). I quite like switching from side to side as soon as I had 2 in the top hand & one in the bottom, it has a Singapore Shuffle like quality to it.
4: It is most likely the point where the truffle is held while it is dipped in the chocolate that forms the outer shell. Although I would prefer to think that the 'Master' in Master Chocolatier is a nod to the master/apprentice dynamic of the Sith.
4: I always assumed it was the opposite - that they left a hole in the shell to pour in the soft middle.
I don't have a Lindor chocolate in front of me, but do they have a visible equatorial line to indicate two halves brought together? If so, I'd go with the "pouring hole" theory. Dipping to get a round chocolate is tricy - look at malteasers, they are rarely round (even though they must be forming the central biscuit to be round and then they are dipped).
I don't remember a seam (chocolate doesn't last long around me).
I've only seen truffles being made by hand using the dipping method & they did come out very round after some painstaking post dip processing so assumed Lindt do the same but using machines.
This video sheds a bit of light:
https://youtu.be/vhk58A5qVuQ
As far as I can tell:
5:20 Truffle centres loaded.
5:23 Truffles coated through the tube like thing & dropped into the trough which recycles the coating (the contraption immediately after the tube is possibly a fan that blows cool air to harden the shell up a little).
5:42 Rotating thing rolls balls to make them rounder.
6:08 The ball drops over the edge from one conveyor to another & stops dead, suggests the shell is still a little soft & tacky, I think the box it then goes through is possibly a fridge.
6:17 The way the balls drop off the lip in the conveyor, roll around a little & come to a stop suggests that they now have the Death Star dimple which was somehow picked up in the fridge.
More factories should open up to the public.
Подписаться на этот форум через RSS
1 статья в ветке
1 статья в посте